<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>According 2 Mark &#187; Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.according2mark.com/tag/pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.according2mark.com</link>
	<description>simple thoughts from a simple man</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The beginnings of a civil war in the Democratic party</title>
		<link>http://www.according2mark.com/2010/01/the-beginnings-of-a-civil-war-in-the-democratic-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.according2mark.com/2010/01/the-beginnings-of-a-civil-war-in-the-democratic-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.according2mark.com/2010/01/the-beginnings-of-a-civil-war-in-the-democratic-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, irritated with White House pressure to accept the Senate health reform bill, took a rhetorical swing Tuesday at President Barack Obama, questioning his commitment to his 2008 campaign promises.  When reminded that candidate Obama promised to make all health care negotiations open to C-SPAN cameras, Pelosi shot back, &#8220;There are a number of things he was for on the campaign trail&#8221;.  It sounds like even the Madam Speaker is beginning to grow wary of this President.  Maybe he is no longer the &#8220;hope&#8221; and &#8220;change&#8221; that she was looking for. As negotiations between the House and the Senate, or more likely Pelosi and Reid heat up, we can expect to see more friction between the Democratic leadership.  It is crunch time where each has to shore up their support with their base.  For Pelosi, that means appeasing a far more liberal electorate than Senator Reid or President Obama has to contend with.  To complicate matters, Speaker Pelosi has to contend with the centrists Democrats in the house who were largely recruited by the man who is now the White House Chief of Staff, former Representative Rahm Emanuel.  Many were elected from conservative districts that generally oppose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, irritated with White House pressure to accept the Senate health reform bill, took a rhetorical swing Tuesday at President Barack Obama, questioning his commitment to his 2008 campaign promises.  When reminded that candidate Obama promised to make all health care negotiations open to C-SPAN cameras, Pelosi shot back, &#8220;There are a number of things he was for on the campaign trail&#8221;.  It sounds like even the Madam Speaker is beginning to grow wary of this President.  Maybe he is no longer the &#8220;hope&#8221; and &#8220;change&#8221; that she was looking for.</p>
<p>As negotiations between the House and the Senate, or more likely Pelosi and Reid heat up, we can expect to see more friction between the Democratic leadership.  It is crunch time where each has to shore up their support with their base.  For Pelosi, that means appeasing a far more liberal electorate than Senator Reid or President Obama has to contend with.  To complicate matters, Speaker Pelosi has to contend with the centrists Democrats in the house who were largely recruited by the man who is now the White House Chief of Staff, former Representative Rahm Emanuel.  Many were elected from conservative districts that generally oppose the current health care reform bills.  Forcing these colleagues to make a difficult vote on the health care bill could doom their chances of re-election.</p>
<p>While the Speaker is secure in her leadership role right now, that could all change if the Democrats suffer big losses in the 2010 elections.  She would be well advised to adopt Reagan&#8217;s 11th commandment:  &#8220;Thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Democrat.&#8221;</p>
<div class="youtube-video"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lxUud3yOsSk&amp;feature=youtube_gdata" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lxUud3yOsSk&amp;feature=youtube_gdata" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></div>
<p><em>(Posted at <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-23540-Kansas-City-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2010m1d6-The-beginnings-of-a-civil-war-in-the-Democratic-party">Examiner.com</a>)</em></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=fe4a8594-631f-82a7-8980-70639f41a3e4" alt="" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.according2mark.com/2010/01/the-beginnings-of-a-civil-war-in-the-democratic-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uncle Sam Wants You…..on the Pill!</title>
		<link>http://www.according2mark.com/2009/01/uncle-sam-wants-youon-the-pill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.according2mark.com/2009/01/uncle-sam-wants-youon-the-pill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.according2mark.com/2009/01/uncle-sam-wants-youon-the-pill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drudge has a headline today stating that Pelosi says that birth control will help the economy.&#160; In a Sunday morning interview with George Stephanopoulos, Pelosi is quoted as saying that contraception will &#8220;reduce cost to the states and to the federal government&#8221;. I can&#8217;t believe this.&#160; Does she even listen to herself?&#160; There is a time and place for the debate on whether the government should be spending tax payer money providing contraception to individuals but it is beyond reasoning to think that it has a place in a stimulus package.&#160; This goes to show that Congress and the Administration is not serious about making sure that this is a clean bill intended to create jobs and rev up the economy.&#160; It is going to be full of pork and earmarks disquised as &#8220;job creating&#8221; or &#8220;cost reductions&#8221;.&#160; It is going to be created based on ideaology and not sound, reasonable judgements. By the way, I would suggest that reducing contraception availability would do more to stimulate the economy.&#160; Increased births would lead to increased health care expenditures.&#160; Job creation in the child care industry will skyrocket.&#160; Parents will be forced to put more of their hard earned dollars into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://drudgereport.com/">Drudge</a> has a <a href="http://drudgereport.com/flashpbc.htm">headline</a> today stating that Pelosi says that birth control will help the economy.&nbsp; In a Sunday morning interview with George Stephanopoulos, Pelosi is quoted as saying that contraception will &#8220;reduce cost to the states and to the federal government&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe this.&nbsp; Does she even listen to herself?&nbsp; There is a time and place for the debate on whether the government should be spending tax payer money providing contraception to individuals but it is beyond reasoning to think that it has a place in a stimulus package.&nbsp; This goes to show that Congress and the Administration is not serious about making sure that this is a clean bill intended to create jobs and rev up the economy.&nbsp; It is going to be full of pork and earmarks disquised as &#8220;job creating&#8221; or &#8220;cost reductions&#8221;.&nbsp; It is going to be created based on ideaology and not sound, reasonable judgements.</p>
<p>By the way, I would suggest that reducing contraception availability would do more to stimulate the economy.&nbsp; Increased births would lead to increased health care expenditures.&nbsp; Job creation in the child care industry will skyrocket.&nbsp; Parents will be forced to put more of their hard earned dollars into the economy instead of in savings.&nbsp; This increase in consumer spending will translate into more jobs, more tax revenue and a more vibrant economy.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.according2mark.com/2009/01/uncle-sam-wants-youon-the-pill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

